I NEED 4-5 PAGES, double spaces, no plagiarism, readings are attached, in text citation using APA:
all questions are based on attached readings , questions should be
addressed using full sentences & paragraphs which demonstrate understanding and refer to reading. grading will be on clarity and complete sentences are always valued. I will look for critical reasoning, logical argument and specific reference to the readings.
I. 1. a. Using specific references and/or quotes, describe and compare the value and social benefits attached to privacy (and the costs associated with its loss) as put forward by Warren and Brandeis in their Harvard Law Review article with the case for privacy made by Maynard-Smith and one of the other authors from the
Private I selections (Norris, or Allison).
b. Protection for the Right to Privacy as advocated by W&B would come at the
expense of what other rights? What limitations to this right do they acknowledge?
II.2. Explain the importance in the spread of ‘soft surveillance’ in the private sector in determining the level of protection citizens have against ‘unreasonable search and seizure’ by their government. Describe the specific opinion in the specific court case that had this linkage as a consequence.
III. 1. a. Describe the reasoning that led Taft to not consider wiretapping a search in Olmstead and why Stewart considered the bugging of the telephone booth a 4th Amendment in Katz.
b. Explain the significance of Weeks v. U.S. concerning gathering and considering
evidence in trials involving the 4th Amendment. Why did it not apply in Olmstead, but did in Katz?
IV. B. The majority in Hiibel found that ‘strong government interest’ justified allowing states to require individuals to identify themselves during a ‘Terry Stop’. Explain what a ‘Terry Stop’ is and what are its limitations. What made the Nevada law ‘reasonable’ where others had been struck down? Briefly summarize Stevens’ stand regarding 5th Amendment protections during such a stop as voiced in his minority opinion.
D.In Riley v California There were two major precedents that were considered, Chimel v. California and US v Robinson. Describe each, tell me which the court decided was
more applicable, and explain their reasoning. What was Alito’s concern with Roberts’ reasoning even though he concurred?